Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-09-02 06:49 pm
[ SECRET POST #2435 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2435 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 049 secrets from Secret Submission Post #348.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 04:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)In the cases where the setting is AU and none of the characters are acting in character, then I almost feel like passing it off as fanfiction is more deceitful as your just glomming on to character names and physical descriptions to attract an established reader base. At that point it's no longer really fanfiction, it's just fiction with familiar character names attached.
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 00:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 01:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 00:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 06:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)Plus, 50 Shades, regardless of its many flaws, started a public dialogue about women's sexual desires (something that is pretty frankly discussed in fandom), and I'm okay with it for that alone.
Also, what's wrong with changing the names of an RPF story and selling it? There's no canon the authors are ripping off in RPF, and no characterisation. Do you want to ban stories with characters inspired by real people now?
Whenever I see people complaining about fanfiction and its bastardisation of the 'creative process', it just makes me think that the people complaining are the ones who don't understand the creative process.
Cassie Claire is getting what she deserves though.(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 01:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:28 pm (UTC)(link)SA
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-02 23:30 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Secondly; I think if it's unrecognizable to the point where names can be interchangeable, and the original characters are so OOC nobody recognizes them, who cares? So you used a characters as inspiration, big deal.
A lot of characters in popular fiction are archetypes anyway, if you change the story and a large part of the personality, then for all intents and purposes, they ARE different characters.
Twilight and 50 Shades are both an umpteenth rewritten Beauty and the Beast Rehash, while Martin uses classic Archetypes (tough he then subverts them and makes them interesting). But you can use those building blocks for other things.
spittake
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)Fanfic should be about celebrating the original world of someone else and sharing stories about it with similarly obsessed people - not money.
Did Cassie Clare actually say that?!
WHAT
WHAT
Re: spittake
Re: spittake
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 00:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: spittake
oh come on
(Anonymous) 2013-09-02 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I'm beginning to agree with some less-than-thrilled authors' opinion on fanfiction. Fanfic should be about celebrating the original world of someone else and sharing stories about it with similarly obsessed people - not money. I've seen people on my f-list write Real Person Fic and then sell it as gay erotica story.
Fan fic is all fun and games until you switch the names and publish it as an original. I get the argument that nothing can be original anymore, everything is derivative, but writing a fanfic and then transforming it and making money off of it is fucked up and it's like a reverse of the writing process.
Go create your own characters, this is not cool. Seriously.
no subject
Taking a fanfic that's set within a world and merely painting over the characters/places without changing much of the source material's inspiration, however, that's where I side-eye a little.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 12:04 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 00:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 01:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 03:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 04:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 14:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 12:23 am (UTC)(link)Unless the author was known as a fanfic writer and/or the original fic was published online and was popular, you can't be sure. If the author never put the fic out for the public to see (or it was only published in some obscure zine that hardly anyone ever saw) and if the author kept their fic-writing persona completely separate from their real identity (whether they use a pen-name for their pro fic or not), you would never know. You may wonder about it, if you can spot similarities to another piece of media, but that's not proof it was fanfic, just that there may have been inspiration taken from that piece of media, or that both stories happen to use similar archetypes, cliches, and conventions. You've probably read some disguised fanfic without ever knowing it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 12:51 am (UTC)(link)It's cheap and lazy to write fanfic and then change it just enough so that it can be passed off as "original." You're piggybacking off of someone else's research and world-building and character creation. You're skipping over all of the truly hard parts.
Fanfic is fantastic if you want to practice and get some quick feedback. But if the only way you can sell yourself is to leech off of something someone else has written, then you might as well volunteer to be James Patterson's ghostwriter, because that's all you're good for.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 12:55 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 07:08 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 01:40 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 04:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
...but what IS the writing process, then?
Re: ...but what IS the writing process, then?
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 01:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
The same Base Plot can be re-told over and over, but the Story won't be the same.
That's NOT THE SAME THING as basing your entire story off someone else's published story.
I don't care if you change names, and remove some elements. You wouldn't have thought of it if it wasn't for that other story.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 02:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 04:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 23:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-03 16:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 04:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-09-03 07:39 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-09-05 05:52 (UTC) - Expand