ext_33427 (
degrees.livejournal.com) wrote in
fandomsecrets2007-12-06 04:00 pm
[ SECRET POST #335 ]
⌈ Secret Post #335 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
1.
__________________________________________________
2.

__________________________________________________
3.

__________________________________________________
4.

__________________________________________________
5.

__________________________________________________
6.

__________________________________________________
7.

__________________________________________________
8.

__________________________________________________
9.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

__________________________________________________
32.

__________________________________________________
33.

__________________________________________________
34.

__________________________________________________
35.

__________________________________________________
36.

__________________________________________________
37.

__________________________________________________
38.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
I'm not actually around, Semagic is doing the work for me, so you guys do the name that fandom! :D
Also... the amount of not posted secrets today worries me. Perhaps some of you could do with a refresher on the rules and regulations?
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 47 secrets from Secret Submission Post #048.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 ] broken link, [ 1 2 3 4 ] not!secrets, [ 1 2 ] not!fandom, [ 1 ] WTF?, [ 1 ] Teal Dear Rant Sans Secret But Amusing Enough To Make A Seperate Category For Because Of The Tattoo.
Next Secret Post: Tomorrow, Friday, December 7th, 2007.
Current Secret Submission Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Now, I guess, the question I have to ask is why pull these characters from those timeplaces? They are inherently setting up the characters/play for the stagnant RCO ruled form, which is odd. Not only odd but it seems like it severely hampers both character growth and play (I can't actually speak on that, not being a player, but it definitely causes some frowns on wondering just how the players deal with it).
No, we simply chose from where to take the characters. Some people updated them (Francesco's case). Abel was updated too... and restarted. Ion was updated. As did Asta. Lilith HAS her nanos, so she is the strongest of them (but no one really TELLS her of the RCO, she's headdesking at the Vatican and the Empire phail atm and probably WILL AGREE they need to go as countries for the order be restored. >_> Lilith's not an angelic pacifist, she crushed armies, set on deadly weapons and was the best war leader, but it took genocide to have her leave of her healer/doctor role).
It isn't that there's RCO favor is that the RCO IS more powerful individually (they kind of WON in Canon? RCO no Cain. Cain wants destruction. RCO wants to cause a war between Vatican and the Empire, which is a clever political move: destroy old nations together, set their own as more powerful. Most members of the Orden ARE from Germanicus ;P Geeee... I wonder why they are resentful of the Empire and the Vatican) and they have larger cast members. Hell to take down RADU (who is epic phail), you needed Ion/sunlight/Petros/Tres AND Radu choosing to die. And that's just Radu. The immature, childish 18 years old Imperial baby. :/ If you feel is unfair, do apply for Ax/Inquisition or Empire. I WANT moar people on their side. I even complated apply for Petros but I already play THREE TB characters.
And since you've read the novels, could you confirm or deny what the other anon has said about Caterina in the RCO and then the thing about her 'ungrounding' Dietrich?
She starts a mental warfare with Dietrich when he's having paranoia issues against Cain (Dietrich's a person who suffered his own family attempting to MURDER him at 6, so yeah, paranoia ahoy) and his worth to him. So she turns him against Cain but he's still very faithful to the Orden ideals. He just wants Cain's dead and out the picture. Considering Dietrich can control the Arc II where the last fight was supposed to take place (Cain vs Abel), he has serious part to play on good guys's victory (however... we don't know 'cause author DIED on us before finishing the novels. Woe). However, I am playing Dietrich fresh out ROM III when he is still... loyal.
I MAY update this in the future but not now with ongoing plots with him involved. He's already having issues after curse days showed him how would have been if he had loving parents and acceptance of his genius. It's getting him. Rosiel's influence is too impacting him. Rosiel's so much like Cain that makes him have... loyalties issues.
Dietrich follows those he considers his superiors. This isn't out of love or loyalty but admiration and survival >_>
Something else you want to ask? :)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:06 am (UTC)(link)I thank you for replying, though I can't quite shake the feeling that the entire Trinity Blood cast seems to have been set up in a way. Not that it's necessarily "horriblewrong" but certainly leaves an odd taste in my mouth.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I am buying the Spanish ones to make my collection grow. >_> I was going to buy them in English, but after hearing SO many negative reviews and given excerpts. Er. No thanks. People who can't translate ranks correctly isn't worth my money. >.>
Asta's not a Duchess.no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
For what I glimpsed it looks more accurate. But... honestly "Rozen Kruez" makes me cringe.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:42 am (UTC)(link)no subject
You are obvious. ;)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 03:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 04:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 04:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
What would you suggest me to "improve" in your opinion?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:27 am (UTC)(link)I have a deep interest in complex humanism or void of, not the political machine. Thank you for your time, at least I won't waste any money buying the rest of the novels now!
(I hope you don't think this is an attack, but a realization of my personal preferences and perhaps why I prefer the manga to the novels. Or why I'm finding myself leaning towards those interpretations.)
no subject
There is that too, but the plot is political. See the war is triggered, but the two strong nations are Albion (led by Esther) and Germanicus (controlled by the Orden). We have NO idea if Germanicus will be defeated in the end by Esther's people. Because the author died... before this happened or was lined up to happen?
Actually, it's quite fitting Germanicus and Albion survive. The Vatican destruction and the Empire blind backslash without their Empress. They are both big on co existence, ironically, Esther takes care of those Ghettos of Methuselah and Germanicus HAS Methuselah and Terran nobles sharing power (as can be seen in the power structure of the Orden). :)
(I hope you don't think this is an attack, but a realization of my personal preferences and perhaps why I prefer the manga to the novels. Or why I'm finding myself leaning towards those interpretations.)
Don't worry. I will suggest you to read the material too. There's big on redeemptions as well: Abel, from crazy mysogist Contra Mundi and war leader who hated humans and slaughtered them (Think Knives from Trigun only with true love who is his opposite: Lilith) to the Abel now.
If I was condescending, please forgive me. I didn't mean to. I tried to explain our choices and why we did this development.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:45 am (UTC)(link)Human struggle, or inhuman struggle, was what I saw in Trinity Blood the manga. Something worth looking at in everyone and an overcoming of single dimensions. Radu is weak, but he also had the strength to break Dietrich's control that one time. Dietrich is twisted, horrible, irredeemable but there's also something worth paying attention there no matter how ugly. Esther (and her nun-ness was up-played and her terrorist downplayed) even though she was the typical female in many ways had a shine to her.
If indeed the RP reflects the novels and (what I feel) all of these characteristics are lost then I have no interest in them.
no subject
As I told before. If there were MORE Ax/Inquisition players, this would change. So far it's RCO centric because ALMOST all the Orden is there. If this displeases you.... er... either apply for someone of your liking.
Dietrich is twisted, horrible, irredeemable but there's also something worth paying attention there no matter how ugly.
Have I not be doing that? Because I'm trying to portray Dietrich with his Luciferean role: outwardly blindingly perfect, the Light Bringer. Inside, he's got Satan's heart who seeks evil. There's also Dietrich's tragic side. He's basically someone born with everything: looks, smarts, wealth, title, and life/socialization turned him into the most evil character ever in his canon. Radu and Esther muns should ask you those, but I'm curious. Because so far you have criticize them but not Dietrich himself. If there's something I should improve with Dietrich (cannot do anything for others), please, by all means, suggest it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 04:05 am (UTC)(link)It also feels like you say he's both just a victim of circumstance but also inherently evil, which is a contradiction. But again, mostly based on reading and I have no idea to your authorial intent.
I see how activity is working against you as well, since the impression that comes off of the RP is that Dietrich controls everything (which may be true? He is the puppetmaster behind many things) but that all the pieces are set around him. And I have missed the pulling his puppets back to him, I haven't been following nor am I a hugely active reader -- I have to say I was fairly spurned on to check out the cast from the secret's declaration of what seemed to be perfection and godly skills. So my surprise was rather great when I saw what seemed to be a huge clash between my own perspective and the secret writer's.
(no subject)
Different McAnon Strikes Again
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:16 am (UTC)(link)Re: Different McAnon Strikes Again
OP has admitted above to have knowledge out Anime and Manga mostly AND to have no pay attention to months of development? I only tried to summarize it, I didn't mean to make it sound condescending. Sorry!
BK Anon here
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:20 am (UTC)(link)Re: BK Anon here
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:28 am (UTC)(link)Re: BK Anon here
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:35 am (UTC)(link)Well, that's a very loose example, but not knowing the canon instantly means you really have no say? What if 95% of the RP doesn't know the canon?
Different McAnon
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:47 am (UTC)(link)Which brings me back to my original point; the OP thought the cast of that RP were OOC based on their perceptions of a canon they're at least somewhat familiar with. And I don't think that that person's concerns are any less valid for not having access to as much canon as those players have.
BK Anon
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 03:55 am (UTC)(link)RP is serious business...
Re: BK Anon
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 04:13 am (UTC)(link)Old McAnon had a Farm...
Everyone can pick up on, say, if you have your char support an ideal today, its opposite tomorrow, and the convenient third alternative next week -- all with the same kind of sincere enthusiasm (so you don't even allow that they're hypocritical) This is when anyone with eyes to read can go, "LOL THAT IS INCONSISTENT."
Same, if you're going on the idea that there is no practical character development, you can throw a nice label of, "STAGNATION FTW."
But in the absence of knowledge of the exact canon of characters' provenance? I'd - personally - say that you can't claim OOCdom. There are a lot of other accusations you can bring forward based on actual play development, rather than canon interpretation... but yeah, I wouldn't, myself, say you can claim OOCdom.
Granted, I come from a background of some acquaintance with the players this secret concerned, so I'm not sure whether you'll want to take my argument into account. Nonetheless, putting it forward.
no subject
There are plenty criticism to give and doesn't involve characterization at all (my English, being not native, isn't the best and I'm aware and I try to improve. Sure there's LOTS of grammar issues). Your basis is my own, Ruxi.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
McAnon/Teal Deer OTP
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
McAnon should probably grab some lunch soon.
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 16:50 (UTC) - ExpandGo and have lunch?
McAnon loves the McRib.
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 17:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 17:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Arby's anon! (Ho shi-- we're branching out!)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 18:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Arby's anon! (Ho shi-- we're branching out!)
Arby's again
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 18:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(frozen comment) Arby's anon has a ps
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 18:26 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) (no subject)
(frozen comment) WENDY'S ANON
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 18:35 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: WENDY'S ANON
(frozen comment) Wendy's anon strikes back!
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 18:40 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Wendy's anon strikes back!
(frozen comment) Re: Wendy's anon strikes back!
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 19:09 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: Wendy's anon strikes back!
(frozen comment) DOING WHAT TASTES RIGHT
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 19:23 (UTC) - Expand(frozen comment) Re: DOING WHAT TASTES RIGHT
[ MOD INTERJECTION ]
McAnon's head/McWall OTP
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 18:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: McAnon's head/McWall OTP
Re: McAnon's head/McWall OTP
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 18:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 13:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 17:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
BK Anon
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
McAnon
(Anonymous) 2007-12-07 05:06 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
Different Anon!
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Different Anon!
BK Anon
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: BK Anon
Re: BK Anon
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: BK Anon
Re: BK Anon
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Re: Old McAnon had a Farm...
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 05:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 06:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2007-12-07 06:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)