case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2016-02-03 06:57 pm

[ SECRET POST #3318 ]


⌈ Secret Post #3318 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
blitzwing: (Default)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-02-04 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
Tl;dr you like an asshole character and are mad when people call it like it is. You're a James version of the snapefen.
iggy: (Default)

[personal profile] iggy 2016-02-04 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
lol they never even said they were a big James fan. You don't have to be a James fan to realize how completely preposterous saying he abused Harry and Lily is.
blitzwing: (Default)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-02-04 12:17 am (UTC)(link)
The guy liked to physically hurt and sexually assault people when he was a teenager; I don't blame people for thinking he might be an abusive partner.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] iggy - 2016-02-04 00:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 13:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:21 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2016-02-04 00:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2016-02-04 00:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 03:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2016-02-04 03:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 03:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] solticisekf - 2016-02-04 01:36 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] solticisekf - 2016-02-04 11:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] greenvelvetcake - 2016-02-04 02:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 13:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 02:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-04 20:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 21:20 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
yyyyeah, you got ANYTHING to back up that "James was abusive to his wife and son" theory?
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-02-04 03:10 am (UTC)(link)
It's not a theory I personally hold, but if someone else wanted to headcanon it I think there's parts of the text that support that headcanon.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 05:28 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:15 am (UTC)(link)
lol you mentalist

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:08 am (UTC)(link)
Saying Snape isn't pure good makes someone a Jamesfen now?
blitzwing: ([magi] drakon)

[personal profile] blitzwing 2016-02-04 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
Getting butthurt because other people think a guy who canonly liked to beat up and sexually assault people, might have grown up to be an abuser is something I would expect from a rabid fan.

I don't see why anyone else would get their panties in a twist over James being seen as a potential abuser.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 04:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 05:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 13:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 05:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 05:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 06:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 06:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 06:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 06:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-04 20:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] tasogare_n_hime - 2016-02-06 17:09 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Found the Snapewife.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
I completely agree with you. Snape was a complex guy. Not being evil doesn't mean he WASN'T an asshole, and his super-fans' bendy-straw contortions of the story to try and make him into a perfect misunderstood little puff pastry are both ridiculous and super immature. You CAN love a guy who is both an asshole and a good man. Indeed, that's what I think is so great about him.
diet_poison: (Default)

[personal profile] diet_poison 2016-02-04 12:56 am (UTC)(link)
I've seen a lot of Snape threads around here lately but none where people were literally saying Snape was perfect/angelic/had no flaws? Of course given how often these discussions come up I probably missed some.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
I should say upfront that I almost always like the "bad guys". To me they are always more interesting and have a better backstory. I like them because they are flawed, often wrong, and make mistakes. I have been intrigued by Snape since the first book because you could just tell there was more to his story then what was there. I don't think any characters in the series are 'born from angel tears'. Everyone in the series even Dumbledore is flawed including your precious James.
philstar22: (Default)

[personal profile] philstar22 2016-02-04 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
I'm usually into bad guys. Snape just hits too close to home for me and the all the Snapefen who excuse his abusive behavior have made me go from disliking him or being uninterested to hating him.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:10 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah "abusive" is the new hot button word now, which is highly counter productive.

But James Potter was always an ass and I wish JK had portrayed him as a better man so that I could actually care when he died. It kind of cracks me up that she is sitting there scratching her head wondering why everyone loves Snape so much when she never bothered to make James likeable other than to say, "He got much better." So what? We want to see it happen damn it!! XD It's hard to care about a character unless we have a compelling reason to do so. And no, him contributing half his genes to Harry isn't good enough.

[personal profile] solticisekf 2016-02-04 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
he also fought Voldemort

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:40 am (UTC)(link)
Didn't do that good a job, did he.

(no subject)

[personal profile] solticisekf - 2016-02-04 01:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] solticisekf - 2016-02-04 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] solticisekf - 2016-02-04 02:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-07 17:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 08:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-04 20:59 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:51 am (UTC)(link)
I thought the whole point of that arc was Harry learning that nobody was perfect, up to and including his parents. It deliberately flies in the face of the typical narrative of the sacrificial parent hero, instead showing that nobody - not even someone willing to go down the heroic sacrifice route - is a perfect person.

Honestly, the idea that nobody is perfect but that doesn't mean you can't do good things is a very key part of the Harry Potter series.

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-04 02:19 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:44 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-04 02:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 03:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:50 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 05:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 13:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] blitzwing - 2016-02-04 15:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-04 04:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] world_eater - 2016-02-04 04:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-04 04:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 15:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-05 00:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] world_eater - 2016-02-04 15:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-04 21:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-05 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-05 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-04 21:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-05 00:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-05 00:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 21:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 09:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 15:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-04 21:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 21:46 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 21:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 22:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 22:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-05 00:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 00:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-04 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-07 18:09 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:39 am (UTC)(link)
James Potter was a rich popular kid who bullied the social outcasts because it amused him to humiliate someone. Someone who does that isn't a good person.

He's an asshole.

That doesn't mean Snape WASN'T an asshole but James is still very much one.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
But didn't James hate Snape because Snape was really into the dark arts (he invented a curse) and hung around with a bunch of people who bullied muggleborns?

IMO James is no worse than your average overzealous teen Tumblr user.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 14:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 21:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 01:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 02:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 05:59 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 20:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 20:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 20:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-07 18:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] solticisekf 2016-02-04 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
Is your hate is so strong that it gives you energy, OP? Then hate away.
It's a hobby, let people interpret the canon as they wish.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 02:26 am (UTC)(link)
On the one hand, I agree that the overly-invested fans can veer into very odd territory, with all kinds of rationalizations. On the other hand, this is fandom, and this kind of behavior is endemic. For instance, have you never come across the great woobification of Loki? The Snape superfans are hardly unique in fandom-land.

(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
Please tell me this is some kind of record, 3 Snape-wanks in under a week?
arcadiaego: Grey, cartoon cat Pusheen being petted (Default)

[personal profile] arcadiaego 2016-02-04 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I never understand 'fans' who turn characters who are written as morally ambiguous or evil into saints. What attracted them to that person in the first place if they're going to ignore who they are? It seems pointless when there are *actual* saintly characters around.
arcadiaego: Grey, cartoon cat Pusheen being petted (Default)

[personal profile] arcadiaego 2016-02-04 09:05 pm (UTC)(link)
P.S. this thread is really scary.

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-05 00:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] arcadiaego - 2016-02-05 00:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 06:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-05 10:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 21:00 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-06 00:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-07 05:13 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 20:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] otakugal15 - 2016-02-06 00:26 (UTC) - Expand