Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-03 06:57 pm
[ SECRET POST #3318 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3318 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #474.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:09 am (UTC)(link)but where does poop fit into this equation
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:14 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 09:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 12:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 18:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 08:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Edit: also, what do you think of Repair Her Armor? http://repair-her-armor.tumblr.com/
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 03:44 am (UTC)(link)But I wish there was an inverted version for male characters. Boys need to slut it up more. WOO!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:07 am (UTC)(link)That however is a horrific photoshop. What the hell is that.
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:09 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 06:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 08:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 09:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 06:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:19 am (UTC)(link)Diversity within an established style is what is important. Elsa shouldn't be a clone of Anna and they shouldn't both be a clone of their mother who is a clone of ever other cg Disney character. Designers need to challenge themselves to create women of all body types (though to be fair I won't put the blame entirely on the designers as it's often the higher ups who won't let diverse body types go to market.)
But I do think body type diversity is important, even in cartoony styles. This doesn't mean we need to lose the "fantasy" or that we can't have skinny characters, of course we can! But we can also have characters with muscle and characters with a few pounds on them, everyone doesn't have the same "fantasy" so we need to stop acting like we should.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 04:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 04:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 04:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 08:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 15:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 06:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 07:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 08:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 09:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 01:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
Re: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 09:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: this
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 23:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:23 am (UTC)(link)OP
***internalized fatphobia***
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:36 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:24 am (UTC)(link)No matter how outrageous your fantasy or sci-fi universe, humans will generally be humans with human limitations because they're the fucking point of reference. You can't create an immersive fantasy world without grounding it on some level of realism and familiarity. No, fat people won't be in amazing shape, children won't be sexually mature, dogs won't be rocket scientists, unless there's a specific context to make those things plausible!
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 00:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 04:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 05:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 09:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 07:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 20:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:03 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:28 am (UTC)(link)I do understand why this stuff is supposed to exist. It's sucky that only my preferences are being met on a large scale. However, I do think you're entirely spot on about why people do this. It's a shaming thing. The internet these days seems to be one big battle ground of "Them and us" and no-one seems to do anything "For us" they all seem to be interested in doing something "Against them", if that makes sense.
Also, I'm kinda sick of the number of people shaming me for liking big tits and small clothes. It's not "I want my fan service to happen" it seems to be more "I don't want your fan service to happen" And that whole "It's just for men" thing is fucking awful. Kinda shows the mentality present when "It's just for men" means "it doesn't matter and should be removed", like, even if only men liked it that would be a good reason to remove something? Cause men are morally wrong, right? If it doesn't make women the focus it actively excludes us and shouldn't be? Never mind how dismissive such an idea is towards the women who like it (Remember women, were the once who matter to you apparently? What about us? If we like something that's "Just for men" does that men we don't matter any more? Do we become honorary men?)
I should stop here. I could rant for days.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:29 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 03:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 04:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 07:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-05 03:25 (UTC) - ExpandFrom personal experience
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 12:39 am (UTC)(link)People want to see depictions of a wide range of body types because the cookie cuter "super skinny but with big boobs and butt" isn't how a mahority of women look.
I'm not saying there's a problem with beig attracted to that kind of thing, but when literally every depiction of "beauty" is this, what the fuck are you saying about real life women?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:37 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 01:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 01:49 am (UTC)(link)Don't get me wrong, the replies to this particular thread aren't nearly as bad as what you'd find in say, the asexuality/demisexuality wanks we used to have on a regular basis. But man, so much vitriol going on up above, on BOTH sides of the debate.
no subject
no subject
And yes, I know there are larger people who can be very nimble. I've seen teh women who are do yoga and certain dances, but for fantasy games, it's very hard to suspend that kind of disbelief. It just doesn't work for Rikku.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-04 02:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-04 02:52 am (UTC)(link)So true. I lost 20 lbs since I started working retail simply because I'm on my feet and moving around all the time. I'd gained weight at my former desk job because all I did was sit there. Once I started being more active, the weight dropped right off. And I don't even exercise beyond work and walking to and from work!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-06 06:39 am (UTC)(link)