case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2021-12-25 04:12 pm

[ SECRET POST #5468 ]


⌈ Secret Post #5468 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.


01.



__________________________________________________



02.



__________________________________________________



03.



__________________________________________________



04.



__________________________________________________



05.



__________________________________________________



06.



__________________________________________________



07.













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 48 secrets from Secret Submission Post #783.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-26 12:21 am (UTC)(link)
Merry Xmas case!

(frozen comment)

[personal profile] fscom 2021-12-25 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
DAILY LINKS:

General comments
Off-topic discussion thread


Games threadThread for games/memes/etc.
Edited 2021-12-25 21:24 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2021-12-26 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Glad you enjoyed it so much, OP!
mishey22: (Default)

[personal profile] mishey22 2021-12-26 04:56 am (UTC)(link)
I put off watching Shang-Chi for SO LONG but it's really good.

I'm glad your interest is rekindled :)

(Anonymous) 2021-12-26 05:55 am (UTC)(link)
I didn't see this in the theaters thanks to Omicron, but am looking forward to watching it next month on Disney+!

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
it's unquestionably great television and great sci fi, but i have serious questions about whether it qualifies as great star trek

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 10:06 pm (UTC)(link)
That's because the Babylon 5 guy pitched B5 to the studio and they stole it and used it for DS9.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-12-25 22:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:15 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 06:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 16:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:33 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 06:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-12-25 22:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] 4thofeleven - 2021-12-26 07:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 08:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:05 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think it's that much better than TNG but I agree that it is the best Trek

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)
The older I get, the more flaws there are apparent in Deep Space Nine. Right now the only two standout concepts from the show are the Garak Bashir relationship, that Berman ordered killed, and the idea that the Federation has free sex changes on demand; and the latter is in one of the worst episodes of the series which doesn't feature the Bajoran religion or Sisko committing a warcrime, which I guess only puts it two thirds of the way down the list at worst.

DS9 laid the foundations for everything that is wrong with modern Trek, especially Section mutherfuckin 31. There is a bunch of episodes I'd take out behind the woodshed and give the Old Yeller treatment if I had my choice.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:26 (UTC) - Expand

NAYRT

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NAYRT

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-12-25 23:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: NAYRT

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 06:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 06:33 (UTC) - Expand

da

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

link to the podcast?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 06:35 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 08:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: da

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:13 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 10:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Gonna copy/paste from the original Secrets You Don't Want to Make thread:

It’s really hard for me to have an objective opinion on this, when DS9 and TOS are my two favourite Trek series. I’m not going to have an unbiased opinion here.

However. There is a fundamental structure difference between DS9 and a lot of the other Trek shows: DS9 was a continuous story arc structure set in a fixed location, vs most of the ship-based shows running episodic exploration stories encountering different problems most episodes. While later ship-based shows like ENT and DISCO also did arcs, it doesn’t work quite the same way as DS9’s consistent factions and location allowed. So … I don’t know about better, but DS9 definitely did allow a different type of story and structure, and if you like that better it makes sense that DS9 would stand out to you.

I actually adore the episodic structure, possibly more than the story-arc one. The TOS crew bumbling around the universe finding every weird space disease and time-lost human colony with an archaic social structure going was fantastic for me. So that on its own isn’t enough to push DS9 into clear winner territory.

There’s also the difference in tone. DS9 was explicitly more cynical than most of the Trek shows until DISCO and PICARD. I think that’s what you might mean by ‘deeper questions and better commentary’? And that’s … arguable. DS9 did a deeper dive into the potential consequences of the Federation and blithely ‘going where no man has gone before’, yes. DS9 also dug very deeply on the idea of an occupation, both the Cardassian occupation of Bajor, and the Federation occupation of the station and the sector. It explored the potential dark side of the Federation in a way that none of other shows have done until very recently.

Those aren’t necessarily deeper questions, though. They’re just more structural. A lot of the other shows have done deep dives on ethical and societal issues, though often more allegorically, and on a more episode-by-episode basis. Again, it’s kind of a story structure thing.

DS9 is just a very different story tone and structure. DS9 is a war story and an examination of the ethics and politics of occupation, done via story arc and set broadly in a single location. TOS was a utopian exploration of myriad different social issues of the time via episodic allegories, allowing the show to move from issue to issue as the ship moved from colony to colony. VOY was a ‘stranded behind enemy lines’ story where the initial focus was on how small isolated factions would react to their surroundings and each other when pushed to for survival, and later took the opportunity presented by a complete lack of Federation presence to see which Federation ideals stuck and which fell away in the wild wild west of the Delta Quadrant. TNG is probably the most representative of all of them, probably just as a raw fact of the length of time it was on, allowing it to flirt with the themes from DS9 and TOS and more, while also showing the raw established fact of the Federation that later shows like DS9 were taking apart and examining. ENT and DISCO both hopped back into prequel territory to examine how that structure came into being in the first place, with ENT borrowing a lot of themes from VOY in the process, while DISCO went a more DS9 route. I haven’t watched PICARD, but it looks like it’s going much more strongly into identity issues, PTSD, and the social reaction to same, as well as the fallout from earlier series.

I think, overall, I honestly don’t think DS9 is necessarily better. It’s just a unique story structure in Trek history that stands out. It had a different POV on a lot of the established Trek tropes, and moved completely away from others. It had a more cynical tone, and was willing to peel away at the foundations of the Trek universe, and was the first of the shows to do so as strongly and structurally as it did. But it also had weaknesses due to the same structure. It didn’t have the freedom of motion of the ship-based shows, didn’t have the ability to explore as widely as they did, both physically in space and socially. And Trek was always an exploration show. It was also always a hopeful show, which DS9 sometimes struggled with quite badly.

But it’s a perfect addition to the canon, because of the contrast it has with the rest. Because it shows the range of things possible within the universe of Star Trek. Because it took the time to do what the other shows weren’t doing at the time. And damn it, it’s one of my two favourites of the shows, and I promise that’s not all because of Garak.

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)
Hated DS9, still do. Most boring depressing ST that ever was.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 08:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 12:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:44 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-12-26 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
DS9 is my favorite too :)

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 06:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 08:18 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:20 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Who is this?

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:27 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 15:41 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 16:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 16:51 (UTC) - Expand
feotakahari: (Default)

[personal profile] feotakahari 2021-12-26 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Plus the good ones tend to die without finishing. I remember a lot of buzz over one called Beardy Bastards where dwarves fought space aliens, and it lasted about five seconds.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 03:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:58 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 11:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Iz is an anti who thinks aging up characters in fanfic and art is pedo, so it's not surprising that she'd be immature about cringe fandoms too.

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 03:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 03:31 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-27 05:07 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
I feel you on this. I recently stumbled across a fic that lifted full quotes from one of mine, word-for-word, and the author hadn't even bothered to give me a cursory kudo on the fic in question. Probably in hopes I wouldn't notice, but still...

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 21:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:45 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:51 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 11:20 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 12:01 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 13:26 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 14:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 15:55 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 16:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 03:05 (UTC) - Expand

This.

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:05 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:56 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 11:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 13:53 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 15:39 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:10 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:49 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 07:36 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 20:17 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
Tbh this is why trans headcanons annoy me. Not because they happen - trans away - but because they're based on factually incorrect assumptions like "I'm a cis woman and trans mens' facial hair, physiologically speaking, works the same as mine, right?"

Oof.

(no subject)

[personal profile] feotakahari - 2021-12-25 22:24 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:04 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 06:30 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:41 (UTC) - Expand

OP

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 01:03 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:49 (UTC) - Expand

Re: OP

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 21:16 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] feotakahari - 2021-12-25 23:09 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:12 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:54 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:42 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:23 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:22 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:07 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 20:37 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] greghousesgf - 2021-12-26 05:29 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 09:17 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 17:44 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2021-12-25 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
NS, NF, etc.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-12-25 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Official advertise your fandom-related event thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO images bigger than 600x600 in either direction (banners, et cetera).
2. ONE POST PER USER under this thread.
3. What IS allowed: roleplay advertisements, fandom comms, fandom events, things like that.
4. What is NOT allowed: anything for profit, any kind of fic/art commissions, seeking 1-on-1 RP, that kind of thing.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-12-25 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Official clickables thread.

RULES FOR THIS:
1. NO huge images or columns of images that require scrolling, please.
2. ONE POST PER USER under in this thread.
3. If you're going to post, try to at least help the others.

[personal profile] fscom 2021-12-25 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
General comments:

(If the thread contains spoilery/triggery content please warn/post as 2nd comment so it collapses!
Please collapse images, too!)

How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) 2021-12-25 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)
🎅 🎄 🎁 🍷

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:10 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 14:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 14:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:33 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 14:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:21 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:44 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 22:45 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:19 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:26 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:30 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 01:25 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:06 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:08 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:41 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 01:18 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 01:38 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:07 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:09 (UTC) - Expand

Re: How is everyone's Christmas going?

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 05:49 (UTC) - Expand

Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:22 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-12-25 23:36 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 08:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-12-26 11:39 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 19:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

[personal profile] kaijinscendre - 2021-12-25 23:48 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-25 23:51 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:17 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 00:27 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:52 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 02:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:32 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:56 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:40 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Based on 4

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 10:41 (UTC) - Expand

Happy Christmas

[personal profile] philstar22 - 2021-12-26 00:01 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Happy Christmas

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 01:46 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Happy Christmas

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 04:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Happy Christmas

[personal profile] greghousesgf - 2021-12-26 05:37 (UTC) - Expand

Personal realization

[personal profile] dani_phantasma - 2021-12-26 06:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Personal realization

(Anonymous) - 2021-12-26 07:15 (UTC) - Expand

[personal profile] fscom 2021-12-25 09:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Games thread!