Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2016-02-17 06:37 pm
[ SECRET POST #3332 ]
⌈ Secret Post #3332 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

(David Bowie)
__________________________________________________
03.

(Great British Bake Off for Sports Relief, Ed Balls)
__________________________________________________
04.

[Pokemon]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Star Wars: TFA]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Damian Lewis, Dick Winters, Band Of Brothers]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Daughter of the Lilies]
__________________________________________________
08.

[David Eddings]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Sengoku Basara]
__________________________________________________
10.

[JJBA]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Men In Black I, II, III]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 022 secrets from Secret Submission Post #476.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-17 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)Though, I don't think they actually did badly at the box office. They must have made money, surely? So Silmarillion might also come some day... though I'm not sure how that would make a successful movie, either.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 00:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-19 05:41 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:27 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 00:33 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:31 am (UTC)(link)There were occasional good parts in the first movie, where they stuck closely to the book (the dwarves at Bilbo's house, the entire scene with Gollum) but it was so bloated and awful.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 00:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 03:52 (UTC) - ExpandHow to make a Hobbit movie...
1. Is this scene about Bilbo? If no, cut it without mercy.
2. Is Bilbo the focal character? If no, cut every other line.
3. Does it involve Bilbo being Bilbo? Keep and polish it until it glows.
Re: How to make a Hobbit movie...
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 00:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: How to make a Hobbit movie...
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-17 11:46 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-17 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-17 11:49 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I don't want to begrude anyone their love for the movies, but I genuinely do not understand it. Not only are they bad Hobbit movies, they are just bad movie in general, :/.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-17 23:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 02:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 04:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 12:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-19 23:03 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:19 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 02:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 01:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 12:57 am (UTC)(link)Once I heard Guillermo del Toro had to leave the project, I knew it was doomed. And by doomed, I don't mean "a flop". More, PJ's heart wouldn't be in it, and he wouldn't have the time he needs to do it well. Thus, we got utter mediocrity and Elf Girl. Ugh.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 01:14 am (UTC)(link)PS -- Really glad Silmarillion will never see the screen because TBH that book fucking sucked.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 01:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 14:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 14:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 04:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 04:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 09:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 14:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-19 23:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-19 23:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 12:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 14:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-19 23:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-19 23:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 06:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 12:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 14:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 17:20 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 01:40 am (UTC)(link)This film has actually made me glad they're not going to do the Silm. I can only image what they'd do with such epic material, and how they'd fuck it up. There are a few "moments" I'd like to see get a big screen treatment (like seeing some of the battles brought to life, the Two Trees, etc.) but there's so much they'd have to add to the material to make it a workable script and it's clear that PJ and company can't do it. It would be a mess.
Maybe if there was a different creative team. It would be great if the Tolkien films weren't so tied to New Zealand anymore, so they can find locations that suit the story. I've always said a GOT tv series might work, especially if it was done AHS-style. I mean, the movies made so much money that the studios will probably put something else out there at some point. I'm braving for a Hunt for Gollum/young Aragorn film. CT will die eventually and I think if they give his heirs enough money, they'll let the Silm get made. I just hope someone new will get a chance - someone who loves the SIlm paired with someone who can adapt something coldheartedly to make it work in a film.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 01:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 15:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 16:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 15:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 15:57 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 01:46 am (UTC)(link)The real issue with the Sil is getting the film rights. Cross that bridge first.
I'm not sure it would make a good movie anyway. A high-budget TV series would suit it better, I think.
no subject
I am going to disagree that a film adaptation of the Silmarillion is a good idea.
(That being said, I'd pay an obscene amount of money for a really good Beren and Luthien adaptation. I think there are certain chapters that could be great. But you can't make a movie and call it The Silmarillion - it would be like filming a history textbook.)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 01:55 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 02:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 02:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 04:25 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 03:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 03:24 pm (UTC)(link)On the other hand, they made so many wads of cash I can't imagine they wouldn't make more of them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2016-02-18 06:03 pm (UTC)(link)And damn, some people here have no chill.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2016-02-18 18:17 (UTC) - Expand