Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2011-06-05 03:36 pm
[ SECRET POST #1615 ]
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
19.

__________________________________________________
20.

__________________________________________________
21.

__________________________________________________
22.

__________________________________________________
23.

__________________________________________________
24.

__________________________________________________
25.

__________________________________________________
26.

__________________________________________________
27.

__________________________________________________
28.

__________________________________________________
29.

__________________________________________________
30.

__________________________________________________
31.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 08 pages, 185 secrets from Secret Submission Post #231.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeats ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
Moirallegiance (derived from the three Moirae, or Fates, and the word allegiance) is a process that occurs between a troll and their "moirail". It is a form of guardianship, but it isn't simply about being platonic soul bros forever, see ANDREW'S COMMENT. A troll is compelled by fate to watch over their moirail and keep them in line. Despite the platonic appearance of this role (as we currently understand it) to us humans, trolls consider it a type of ROMANCE. It is one of the two conciliatory relationships, the other being auspistice. Moirallegiance's quadrant is known as the pale quadrant. As it is a redrom, it is linked to pity in the same way that black romance (blackrom) is linked to hate. Moirallegiance is a portmanteau of "moira" (fated) and "allegiance." This kind of relationship may be most similar to the Greek concept of στοργή (STORGĒ), or "like family," which can be defined as "mom shut up i'm not a baby."
So while it is a "romance" in technical terms, it's not one of the reproductive quadrants, and can more or less be equated to platonic friendship in human terms. I think there's a difference (albeit a fine line) between romance and actual sexual attraction, and that's where moirallegiance vs. matespritship comes into play.
Also:
Known moirails:
FEFERI and ERIDAN (Formerly)
EQUIUS and NEPETA
KANAYA and VRISKA
KARKAT and KANAYA (Unconfirmed)
JACK NOIR and DRACONIAN DIGNITARY (Probably not an exact parallel, as Jack Noir seems to despise romance of any kind)
So it's unconfirmed, but still strongly implied, much like Karkat and Terezi's matespritship. Also, I think it's also implied that you can have more than one person in a quadrant at a time. That was never specified, but never denied, either.
ugh ugh SORRY I just get fiercely defensive of moirallegiance cos it's my favorite ;_;
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:30 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 01:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 01:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:56 (UTC) - Expand^
Re: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
Re: ^
Re: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 00:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 00:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 01:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
Re: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 11:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 16:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 17:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 22:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: ^
-1
Re: -1
Re: -1
Re: -1
Re: -1
Re: -1
Re: -1
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 11:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 23:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 00:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 23:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:53 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:53 (UTC) - Expand+1
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 01:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
Unrelated
Re: Unrelated
Re: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 23:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-07 22:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 04:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 04:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 23:21 (UTC) - Expandre-reading this
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 23:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 00:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(no subject)
Re: OP
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 03:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 12:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Despite being considered a romantic relationship, I really feel like Kanaya's sexuality would not come into play with moirallegience. There is not sexual attraction involved at all, so what she identifies as wouldn't matter.
"It's nice of you to want to erase women from positions of importance in other women's lives, though!" I felt like this comment was really unnecessary and irrelevant to everything else. It's not about taking Vriska out of the equation at all. It's about personal preference for shipping, which by the way, is not even that big of a deal!!
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-05 08:53 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-05 09:06 pm (UTC)(link)you act like you're some huge authority on the comic but you actually dont even have a basic grasp on what moirallegiance is and you've somehow completely misunderstood one of the core relationships between the trolls
lol
no subject
You do realize that Kanaya has canonically been involved in conciliatory relationships with male trolls considering she was Eridan and Vriska's auspistice? ~(-_-)~ Troll romance, how does that work?
okay to be fair troll romance is confusing and I don't think that Hussie always follows his own rules, but still
OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:37 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 21:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 00:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-05 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Also I don't think trolls really have more than one moirail at a time? It doesn't say they can't, but since all the known pairs are singular, I think all their energy for the quadrant goes to one person.
Maybe Karkat has a pale crush on Kanaya? "ARE YOU DONE WITH THAT SOCIOPATH SPIDERBITCH, WILL YOU BE MINE NOW?" And she's just not that interested, too busy putting Rose on a pedestal.
I put too much thought into this damn comic, ffffgh
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-07 03:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Troll romance sure is weird!
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-05 10:42 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-05 10:44 pm (UTC)(link)I understand your right to fear men etc...But I think you're the one who fucking missed the "first fifty times Andrew attempted to explain troll romance". See Kanaya being the auspistice of Eridan/Vriska and Vriska/Tavros.
Also, it's not because you decide that "queer shouldn't hang out with men" that everybody will apply your principle of life.
Now I'm fucking off, cause I feel like I've wasted my time answering a huge troll.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-05 22:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
The "want to erase women from positions of importance in other women's lives" thing is straight-up dumb, though.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-09 14:26 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-05 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)I don't ship it myself, but I don't think it's fair to say that it's anti-woman or hypocritical.
no subject
no subject
I have plenty of faults, but believe me, being "male-priviliging and lesbophobic" are definitely, definitely not among them. I just think Kanaya<>Karkat is adorable and works really well, though I prefer it as a side dish to a main course of Kanaya<3Rose.
no subject
I don't ship Kanaya <> Karkat at all, but seriously
Given how much more complicated Troll romance is than Human romance, I don't see how questions of sexual preference would not be accordingly more complicated. Which is to say, I see no compelling reason that a troll's preferences must be the same across all quadrants.
I think this is why they don't have any word for "gay" or anything equivalent. They'd need words for preferences towards at least 4^3 sex/quadrant combinations (assuming "male-only", "female-only", or "either one" as possible preferences for each) in order to account for all the possible configurations, and that's not even considering all the possible variances in configurations for Auspisticeship, or for more complex preferences such as "I like my matesprit to be the opposite sex of whatever my kismesis is," or "I like to keep all my quadrants the same, but either male or female works"; and even that isn't considering anything outside the gender binary.
So, long story short, I think you're kind of overextrapolating on exactly what Kanaya's canon sexuality entails.
Re: I don't ship Kanaya <> Karkat at all, but seriously
Re: I don't ship Kanaya <> Karkat at all, but seriously
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-06 02:03 am (UTC)(link)Yeah, how about no
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 02:24 (UTC) - Expandjust wanted to get a word in
(Anonymous) 2011-06-06 02:50 am (UTC)(link)1. Kanaya and Vriska as moirails is over, in story. Kanaya felt flushed for Vriska, who felt flushed for Tavros, and so they stopped being moirails.
2. "Lesbian" is a sexual orientation, i.e. who you find physically attractive. Moirallegiances, as far as the series has shown, have nothing to do with sex and are dependent on who complements the other. So I don't think sexual orientation has anything to do with the matter, or at least that's the way I see it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2011-06-06 02:59 am (UTC)(link)Man, fuck these people taking a webcomic too seriously.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 06:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 06:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 12:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 10:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 22:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-07 03:02 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-06 14:01 (UTC) - Expand/rants
+1
Re: +1
Re: /rants
(Anonymous) - 2011-06-09 14:33 (UTC) - ExpandRe: /rants
Re: /rants
(no subject)
(no subject)