Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-28 03:33 pm
[ SECRET POST #2126 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2126 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
17.

__________________________________________________
18.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 106 secrets from Secret Submission Post #304.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 07:49 pm (UTC)(link)Length and breadth is a big issue. A newbie to DC or Marvel's huge universes, or to a manga with 500+ chapters like One Piece, I seriously would not blame them very much if they have no time
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 19:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 19:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 20:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 14:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 20:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 20:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 20:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 02:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-30 20:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
That being said, I'm not sure what's with this OP's waspish tone. Wasn't there a better way to write it down, I wonder? >>
OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 21:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 22:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
Re: OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 23:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 01:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 01:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 21:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Perhaps OP just likes reading about it more?
Maybe that's just a better format for them.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 23:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 00:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 22:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 08:06 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 00:52 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 08:19 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 23:20 (UTC) - ExpandOP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 23:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 00:34 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)On the other hand, I have fannish feelings for fandom itself, which is likely akin to your practice.
no subject
+1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 22:13 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
Re: +1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 23:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 01:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
Re: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 19:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 22:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 22:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: +1
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 22:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 09:43 pm (UTC)(link)I'll sometimes see something about a canon and think, ooh, that looks interesting, but then I'll go watch/read/play at least some of it, before making fanworks. Even if I was confident that I knew enough about the characters, I'd like to have actual experience with the thing I claim to be a fan of.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-28 23:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 01:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 17:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 02:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 04:42 (UTC) - ExpandComing clean
no subject
It's not that I think there's anything objectively wrong with liking ATG, but it's annoying for those of us who really do care about canon characterisation.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 20:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)For instance, once I made little keychains featuring the characters of a series and gave them out at a meet. One person dressed as 'popular yaoibait' character from late in the show said 'just give me whichever' and and I thought they must then like all the characters, right? Nope, because when I handed them one of the first characters ever introduced (saying "here, have (her name") they said "no idea who that is, but whatever."
I was too shocked to take it back and try to give it to someone who'd appreciate it, but I wish I had.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-28 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-29 12:16 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 03:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 19:53 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-29 02:03 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
However, OP if you did your research and don't tell me I will probably read your fic none the wiser.
Personally, I'll sometimes read fic on an archive for fandoms I have no familiarity with. That's what happens when I follow tags on AO3. When I do that for the most part I am reading it the same way I would read original fiction since I don't really know the characters and a lot of the fic are AUs anyway.
When it comes to writing though, I think it's strange to not have seen or read ANY of the source material. I get that some source materials are too vast or difficult to obtain to see/read them all and I have written one Marvel 616 one-shot having only read some of the comics and spending a lot longer on the wikis. So I get that. But personally, when it comes to TV shows if possible I try to watch things at least twice before I write. *shrug* But that is how my obsessions tend to go and other people can do whatever they want.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 02:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 02:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-29 10:41 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:21 (UTC) - ExpandAHAHAHAHAHA
(Anonymous) 2012-10-29 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)We talk about you behind your back, oh yes.
Re: AHAHAHAHAHA
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 18:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: AHAHAHAHAHA
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-29 20:01 (UTC) - Expand