Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-06-23 06:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2729 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2729 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[killer is dead]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Lackadaisy]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Joe Trohman, Fall Out Boy]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Yowamushi Pedal]
__________________________________________________
06.

[How To Train Your Dragon 2]
__________________________________________________
07.

[A Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Fruit's Basket]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Community]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Rythian, a.k.a Joakim Hellstrand]
__________________________________________________
11.

[The Devil Wears Prada]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Night Court]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 057 secrets from Secret Submission Post #390.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:01 pm (UTC)(link)(tw: rape, incest, abortion)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:02 pm (UTC)(link)I read the book 'Tender Morsels' because I thought it was a redo of the classic story 'Snow White and Rose Red', including the bit about the man trapped as a bear, so I was like 'that's cool'. And then there was incestual rape and gang rape and forced abortions and TWO bears and one of them is a perve and the heroine basically has NOTHING GOOD happen to her and it made me feel icky and depressed for days. Ick.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)* Terry Goodkind - wtf is wrong with this dude
* Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series - long and dull as dishwater
* Deathly Hallows
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
I think the synopsis for V.C Andrews' books have truly been the one thing in life I wanted some brain bleach for.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 22:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 01:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 04:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 14:56 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
The Pearl by John Steinbeck. It was a good book that I had to read for school. But I was not expecting it to be so damned heartbreaking.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 01:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors) tw rape, incestuous rape
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)Deerskin, by Robin McKinley. She was another author I enjoyed until I encountered the incestuous rape.
This sort of thing is one of the reasons why I enjoy fanfic - that sort of stuff is warned for.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors) tw rape, incestuous rape
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors) tw rape, incestuous rape
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors) tw rape, incestuous rape
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors) tw rape, incestuous rape
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 01:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
That was bad enough. Then David Lapham wrote the 2nd and 3rd volumes.
David Lapham needs to be locked the fuck up.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 07:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
The Evolution of Bruno Littlemore (SERIOUS ick)
* This is supposed to be a moment with deep moral and philosophical implications, showing how the protagonist differs from his father (the frog rapist), how he differs from the people watching, and why the people watching will never understand him. It's a chimp raping a frog to death. Ew.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:14 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 04:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 09:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 01:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
... as did Hannibal by Thomas Harris, which I stood in line at midnight to buy when it was released, read non-stop, and then threw it across the room in disgust around chapter 90.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 04:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)The book wasn't brain-bleach horrible, but I've never been so disappointed in a book I paid for based on nothing but one review.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
That being said, The Wasp Factory did have a huge WTF factor for me. It was given to me by my ex (here, you must read this!) and it did not turn out the way you think. (Do not read this book if descriptions of deliberately killing wasps bother you).
That being said, I do think it's GOOD, just somewhat disturbing.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 01:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 18:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-23 11:44 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-23 23:53 (UTC) - ExpandMother trucking Janet Evanovich tw: assault
Having never read anything by this author, I didn't know what to expect. This book is drivel and a complete waste of time. I forgot the main character's name and kept having to check the back of the book. None of the characters had any personality, what passed for a plot was so thin it could turn sideways and disappear, and the one character who MIGHT have been interesting was given no development or motives. The main character is bullied by her romance interest, who forces his way into her bed, and at point is thought to have been assaulted and/or raped. The emotional trauma is brushed off in favor of the monkey who flips everyone off every other page. I will not be reading anything else by this author. This book was trash.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 12:01 am (UTC)(link)Oh, and 'My Name is Memory' by Ann Brashares because the ending was so abrupt and unsatisfying. It was alright up to that point, but the last couple pages tipped it into the 'do not recommend' category. (Several years later and I'm still annoyed by the ending.)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
The main character is selfish, childish, violent against innocent humans despite her superhuman strength, and unprofessional, but never redeems herself. Most of the other characters aren't much better.
The only good thing about this book was the sassy gay friend stereotype who was actually straight.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
I will never stop ranting about this book okay. Never.
Copying and pasting from when I ranted about it on tumblr:
-----
K, so, the book I’m reading is… Interesting.
Like, I picked it up because it was about kayaking the inside passage, something I am actually highly interested in.
But it’s kind of awkward reading? Like, I feel like it’s not just a book about a woman solo kayaking the inside passage but about a WOMAN solo kayaking the inside package.
Which would be great, if she talked about some of the legit. issues that women might face! Like, how do you deal with pms-ing when there’s bears and wolves about?
But no.
Instead it’s got really weird descriptors like hummingbirds as “red as period blood”. Yes. Thank you. That’s REALLY what I want to be thinking about when I see a humminbird; my fucking period.
And then, like, she did something to her knife so it looks like labia, and I’m just like ??? why??? Do you get some ~magical ~woman ~power because of it?
Like, I just cannot comprehend putting genitals on your knife, ‘kay? A knife made to look like a dick would get just as much confusion out of me (unless it was played for laughs. This author, however, is completely serious.)
AND THEN she’s fishing, and comes upon a sea urchin, and is gonna eat it, but then she compares the opening of the sea urchin to vagina dentata??????
???????????????????????????????????????????????
AND THEN
she keeps randomly bringing up spiritual information from the various tribes she knows about along the Pacific Northwest, and then practicing different spiritual components from each of them?
Like, she looks at the Eagle, and she says “this tribe believes this of the eagle” and then she prays to the eagle using that tribe’s belief system? Which wouldn’t weird me out so much if she wasn’t constantly picking up things from a ton of different cultures? Like, one minute she’ll mention one culture, and then another, she’ll mention another, and she keeps doing things from all the various cultures, and I just kind of side-eyeing her because you can’t just pick and choose things from a ton of different cultures, and do it to be ~closer ~to ~Earth.
IDK, I’m NOT actually Native, so maybe actual Native persons might think I’m overreacting, but it’s something I’ve noticed.
-----
Also, every man in that book wanted to rape her. Apparently.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 01:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) 2014-06-24 12:55 am (UTC)(link)I went into it as a big fan of Earthbound, thinking Itoi enjoyed some quirky aspect about it. Let's just say it was as far from that game as it could get. I had to bleach the hell out of my brain from the numerous squicks that book hit for me. It was definitely not what I expected.
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 01:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
Re: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 03:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 03:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 04:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 04:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 04:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 05:11 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 09:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-24 23:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Why did I read that?? (tw: multiple ick factors)
(Anonymous) - 2014-06-25 03:43 (UTC) - Expand