Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-05-18 03:57 pm
[ SECRET POST #2693 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2693 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 058 secrets from Secret Submission Post #385.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - blank image ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 20:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
+1
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 22:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 03:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 02:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 05:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Oh yeah
Re: Oh yeah
Re: Oh yeah
Re: Oh yeah
Re: Oh yeah
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
Re: Tender moments, yeah. (spoilers)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 08:32 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
In ALL the fandoms I'm in...
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 02:57 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 08:35 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 20:40 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
Actually, same with those shippers who go "lol, we all know they just *have* to be in love. There's no way they're not in love." When in fact, there's a whole lot of ways the characters might not be romantically in love without it being a denigration of the characters' worth or their non-romantic relationship's importance. The weird "romance = validation" thing weirds the hell out of me. (This was really especially gross in Harry Potter fandom, where it seemed like a lot of shippers didn't really care about, say, Harry/Hermione as a relationship, but just wanted Hermione to be validated as The Best Female Character by getting deemed worthy of being fucked by The Chosen One. Ew.)
no subject
There's a reason why it's called shipping WARS. It's not about preferences or opinions, it's about WINNING.
THIS.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 02:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 22:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 21:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 01:33 (UTC) - ExpandI actually actively Do Not Want my ships to be canon.
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)Re: I actually actively Do Not Want my ships to be canon.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 21:09 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I actually actively Do Not Want my ships to be canon.
Re: I actually actively Do Not Want my ships to be canon.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 23:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I actually actively Do Not Want my ships to be canon.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 01:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I actually actively Do Not Want my ships to be canon.
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 06:07 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)The other thing (maybe similar) is that a romantic storyline is like other kinds of storylines -- it's part of a character development arc. If early on you think X/Y is happening and that makes you more interested in the canon, and then X/Y peters out into nothing or X/Z happens instead, it gives me this feeling of unresolvedness or a missed opportunity for a strong finish to that character arc.
I agree with others that part of it is the ability to get more moments for the pairing in canon, as well as the whole "validation that I'm right" thing (but more in a "So I'm not crazy for thinking there was something going on between those two! Yes!" kind of way). You have a point, though, that when the fandom as a whole is cool with disregarding canon and ships the non-canon pairing, then your OTP being canon won't magically make you happy. Juggernaut pairing vs. unpopular pairing issues, heh.
no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 21:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 22:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 22:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 06:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 11:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 06:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 21:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)(I guess I also have a pretty good eye for what's likely to be canon - nothing in the vein of the classic Delusional Johnlock Shipper, for example - so when I ship things I know are unlikely, I run with it and have fun. When I ship something that really feels like it has a shot, but it doesn't make it, I'm kind of devastated.)
no subject
But I'll grant a lot of the time it does seem to come off as internet pissing contests over which ship is 'better'.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 06:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
USED TO.
I'm blaiming Whedon for all of my non-canon ships.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-18 23:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 01:38 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 10:54 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Ah, Gamrezi. How I wish you had just remained subtext.no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 11:47 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 00:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 01:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 19:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 09:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 19:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-20 03:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-05-18 11:48 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 01:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 02:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 03:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 03:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 03:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 03:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 05:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 14:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-19 22:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-05-20 03:02 (UTC) - Expand