Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2015-02-26 07:06 pm
[ SECRET POST #2976 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2976 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

[Homestuck]
__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

[NCIS: Los Angeles/Hawaii Five-0]
__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

[Left Shark (Katy Perry? Super Bowl?) and Bad-Dragon .com]
__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

[hindsight]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 016 secrets from Secret Submission Post #425.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Transcript by OP
Secret because they are obviously intended to be bisexual and if I ever said this I’d be eviscerated as a homophobe who wants to take representation away from a marginalized group.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:17 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:25 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 04:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 06:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:28 (UTC) - Expande_e
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 17:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:20 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 07:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 19:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 19:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 19:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 21:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-05-08 05:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 06:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 19:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 21:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 02:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 15:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 19:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 22:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 22:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:35 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:28 am (UTC)(link)So... Straight, but trying to get brownie points.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:30 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 03:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 02:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 13:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 19:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 21:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:31 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:37 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Anyway, since it was left it open you can headcanon it any way you like, but yeah, you'll probably not get too great reactions, for several reasons.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 15:09 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 12:34 am (UTC)(link)Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Anyway, it's one thing to rant about how such-and-such a poster isn't really biromantic, but I'm a bit off-put that we're already getting folks who think biromantic doesn't even exist. It's one of the terms asexual people use when trying to explain that not wanting sex doesn't mean they don't want romance.
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 09:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 00:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 02:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 15:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 15:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
+1
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 15:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 15:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 15:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 02:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 05:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
Re: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 05:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Am I the only one here who believes biromantic is a thing that exists?
no subject
It is not cool and if you dare post that in the tag you will hurt many people and make quite a few justifiably mad.
Keep that headcanon to yourself and maybe think about the implications. You mighhhttt get away with romantic asexuals...in a few years. But right now? No.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 07:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
Its' why WoW has grabbed me so hard. I can play with my OCs and just stick to that. No reading way too into shit to see if they fit the new flavor sexuality/labels of the week/month/year.
Do what you want OP, so long as it makes YOU happy and fuck everyone else in this thread.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:19 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 01:19 am (UTC)(link)(he gets to do what he wants, but the political wanking was just icky.)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 04:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-28 03:01 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 01:33 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 01:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 02:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 01:48 am (UTC)(link)are you also a demiboy two spirit otherkin
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 02:34 am (UTC)(link)So I understand where you're coming from, but I'm actually really happy they went with flat out bisexual. It was awesome to see that headcanon made into actual canon.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 03:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 07:20 (UTC) - Expandayrt
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 16:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 19:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 21:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 20:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 20:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 21:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-28 00:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-28 05:39 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 02:39 am (UTC)(link)... even though robots don't have genders unless programmed to think they do
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 02:40 am (UTC)(link)i mean, at least your "secret because" is 100% on point, so you have that going for you
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 02:48 am (UTC)(link)I'm biromantic heteorsexual, too, anon. I love having a romantic relationship with a woman. All the kissing, cuddling, silly lovey-dovey feelings, spending time gazing into each others eyes and wanting to hold hands all the time. It's awesome. But the only way I get off sexually is if there's a dick involved. It sucks because I actually prefer women romantically and I always feel crappy that a vagina in the face is a turn off for me. I'm not really good with my hands, either, so I getting a partner off is difficult for me.
So I understand where you're coming from, but I'm actually really happy they went with flat out bisexual. It was awesome to see that headcanon made into actual canon.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 06:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 06:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 16:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 16:56 (UTC) - ExpandDA
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 16:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 20:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 20:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 21:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 22:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 23:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2015-02-27 03:57 am (UTC)(link)It's like the meme of an old lady saying "Aw, look they're such good friends" with a picture of two girls kissing
As long as you're not forcing your headcanon on anyone else, it's perfectly fine to have though
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 14:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2015-02-27 17:11 (UTC) - Expandno subject