Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-05-17 06:34 pm
[ SECRET POST #2327 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2327 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
#14 is a moving .gif.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[Sofia the First]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Once Upon a Time]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Tara Strong, John de Lancie]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Iron Man 3]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Cristiano Ronaldo]
__________________________________________________
07.

[BriTANick]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Teen Wolf]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Community]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Batman movies (Nolan)]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Nine Inch Nails]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Harry Potter]
__________________________________________________
13.

[Romeo and Juliet, 1968]
__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
15. [SPOILERS for Supernatural]

__________________________________________________
16. [SPOILERS for Star Trek: Into Darkness]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
17. [repeat]
__________________________________________________
18. [WARNING for suicide]

[Supernatural]
__________________________________________________
19. [WARNING for non-con]

__________________________________________________
20. [WARNING for dubcon]

__________________________________________________
21. [WARNING for eating disorders]

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #332.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
http://i43.tinypic.com/nfr48y.jpg
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-17 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)Also, I'm not sure why exactly some critiques of the film are totally out of bounds, or how the boundaries are defined between the place where you can only talk about whitewashing, and the place where you're allowed to talk about the film in general, or who created those boundaries.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-17 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)Take the way the movie portrays women for example. Uhura is a typical sulky woman having a fight with her boyfriend. When this is resolved she is back to being a switchboard operator. Alice Eve is only there for an underwear shot that makes no sense (why would you get changed in front of the shuttle windscreen? Why not just say you're dressing?).
Also, some people are interested in screen writing and film making and were disappointed in pacing and direction. To say that people can only pick one issue with the film to complain about is idiotic. Not everyone is concerned with the same values.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-17 11:50 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-17 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-17 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 12:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-19 23:33 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 02:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 03:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:21 (UTC) - ExpandRicardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 01:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 08:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 12:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 19:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 12:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
Re: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 19:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Ricardo Montalban was white.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-17 11:12 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 08:56 am (UTC)(link)idk why you're putting whitewashing in quotes, either.
SJWs have been insufferable beyond belief in the past, but this is an instance where they're absolutely correct, primarily because 1.) there was absolutely no reason to have Cumberbatch be Khan except for cringeworthy nostalgia moments gone horribly wrong, and 2.) Star Trek as a franchise has been fighting this kind of subtle erasure since the day it aired, making this misstep especially egregious.
no subject
Karl Urban deserves spotlight so much more than Zoe Saldana, i personally thought she was terrible in the first movie and i cringed every time she formed "emotion" on her face
god damn :(
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-17 23:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 02:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:47 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-17 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)It's like you're not allowed to just dislike anything anymore and so everything has to be couched in terms of social justice and representation because those are the only complaints where people have to take you seriously. I think those complaints are legitimate in themselves but it's just frustrating the position they've taken. If you don't like something, you know what? That's okay. Stop trying to justify your dislike by figuring out a way that the thing you dislike is actually evil.
not necessarily saying that OP is doing this, just something that seems to happen
(no subject)
no subject
It's not your special thing to be upset about whitewashing. Or only whitewashing.
OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:04 (UTC) - ExpandRe: OP
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-20 17:03 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 12:03 am (UTC)(link)(although the reality is just that they wanted to cast a half-decent currently bankable actor with a large fan following, which is what Bennedict Cumberbatch is)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:15 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 02:48 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 02:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
Re: da
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 21:18 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-20 05:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:27 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 12:06 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 07:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 12:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 00:24 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 12:30 am (UTC)(link)So fuck em, the movie is great.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 07:14 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 12:32 am (UTC)(link)http://popwatch.ew.com/2013/05/14/j-j-abrams-star-trek-star-wars-daily-show/
no subject
We are only accepting certain issues as valid complaint at this time.
These issues will be determined by one OP, head of staff, and all other complaints are prohibited from the fandom premises.
All requests for complaint must be filled out in triplicate, signed, and turned in to OP's inbox. There will be a blood test and a drug test. Applications typically take between 5 - 8 weeks to process.
Thank you,
Fandom Complaints Management Staff"
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 01:45 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:44 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 01:58 am (UTC)(link)This doesn't feel like Star Trek to me - that doesn't mean it can't be an enjoyable film, just that messing with it as they have (all the previous complaints and now the changing of Khan) makes it feel like it just tacked on the "Star Trek" name, rather like how the new Devil May Cry game felt. Would people have liked the movie if it didn't have that "brand"?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 02:03 am (UTC)(link)Pull up the big boy/big girl panties, get over yourself.
I'm old school, haven't seen this movie, couldn't care less either way about it, but I respect the opinions of anyone who loves it or hates it for any reason. I suggest you do the same and save yourself pointless aggravation.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 02:13 am (UTC)(link)OK his skin is the wrong colour, but in all other regards he fucking nailed is as Kahn.
The right actor for the job is more important than the right skin for the job, imo.
Oh, and I'm not an excessive Cumberbitch or anything, I just think he did a great job.
+1
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 05:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 07:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 08:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 12:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-20 02:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 12:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 15:22 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 15:38 (UTC) - ExpandJJ Abrams isn't a fan of Star Trek, remember?
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 02:14 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 02:29 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 03:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 03:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 03:21 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 03:27 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 03:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 05:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 03:03 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-18 06:47 am (UTC)(link)It's pretty much been proved impossible for a child of mixed parentage to be darker than, or even the same skintone as, a its darkest-toned parent. (http://multiracial.com/site/content/view/459/27/)
So, in theory, if you mix enough genes around you're going to end up with white, and since the Star Trek reboot is a typically grimdark world for this era of filmmaking, nu!Khan probably never saw enough of the sun to get a tan. Therefore, his being white makes perfect sense.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 09:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 17:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 20:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 23:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-18 20:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-20 02:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2013-05-20 22:17 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2013-05-22 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)I hope you saw the movie by now and enjoyed it - there's a wealth of lovely things inside, and everything else will get fixed by fan fiction :)