Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-23 03:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2609 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2609 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)I can't deal some of parts tumblr without blacklisting the hell of them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:10 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:32 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:04 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 08:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:44 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 04:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:09 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:45 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:11 pm (UTC)(link)*not counting redfemanon and similar trolls
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:29 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:10 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-25 04:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 04:24 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 04:54 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:46 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
lol
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: lol
Re: lol
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:20 (UTC) - ExpandThank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Everything that's popular with almost exclusively females, especially teenage females, is universally shat upon. Sure, 50 Shades and Twilight aren't classic literature, but FSoG is one of the first mainstream erotic novels depicting a BDSM relationship (albeit an inaccurate one), and the Twilight Saga is one of the first popular novel series that objectified male characters just as much as the female characters (and the movies had actual Native American actors playing Native American characters instead of whitewashing them like a certain sci-fi movie that everyone seems eager to defend, even on Tumblr). Hell, certain shows that shall remain unnamed have been canceled because their viewership was mostly girls rather than the boys they were marketed toward. Tumblr has a very strange and at times impossible format and the same subset of crazy users that every website has, but damn if it isn't refreshing to finally be able to call people out on their shit without being roasted under an immediate deluge of 'not all ___ are like that!!1!' or 'they weren't being my idea of __ist so it doesn't count.'
Teal deer says, 'Tumblr is no different than any other website other than the fact that it's populated largely by teenage girls, therefore it must be a piece of shit.'"
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 23:03 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:17 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 04:25 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-27 22:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 05:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:22 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:26 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 05:14 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:40 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 03:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:05 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 05:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 18:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:46 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:24 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:50 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 03:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 05:22 (UTC) - ExpandI get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 15:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 03:59 (UTC) - ExpandRe: I get where you are coming from, but I have to disagree.
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
Re: Thank you, F!S, for proving OP's point
tl;dr incoming
Sometimes this can be really neat, like that post about how the only flower language they knew was about love and junk, and they wanted a way to say meet me at the docks at midnight with a bouquet of flowers". Someone who knew a lot about flower language eventually found that and added instructions on how to do just that, with links to more resources. Other times? Half of us already saw that post and got angry about it, or did some quick fact checking and found out it was all lies. The rest have never seen it before and are OUTRAGED and have to message the OP RIGHT AWAY to tell them how wrong they are, and tons more people reblog it adding their wordy opinions and nobody sees them because of reblogging. Meanwhile the OP is dogpiled because nobody actually bothered to look at their blog and see that they apologized or that the actual original poster deleted and they stole the username and turned it into a Cory in the House blog...it's a stupid vicious cycle that has more to do with the setup of tumblr than the actual users, who are pretty much the same wherever you go.
Re: tl;dr incoming
Re: tl;dr incoming
Re: tl;dr incoming
Re: tl;dr incoming
Re: tl;dr incoming
Re: tl;dr incoming
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 13:34 (UTC) - ExpandRe: tl;dr incoming
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:32 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:13 (UTC) - ExpandHow so?
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:38 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:42 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:08 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:12 (UTC) - Expandno subject
Just accept that when a site has 172 million blogs there are guaranteed to be entire worlds of it that you are unaware of.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)"If you belong to ___ place, you're cool." ; "___ people belong to ___ place."
Yep. Grade school mentality at its best.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 18:50 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 21:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:18 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:59 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 10:05 pm (UTC)(link)You could relax there, not worry that someone was going to read something into what you said and find it problematic. As long as you don't say anything ignorant or offensive, you're fine. And it wasn't like there wasn't any social issues there, there were some good stuff, but there was never any drama.
Come back to lj or f/s, it's policing every word you type if it involves anything social. Will this offend someone? is not a question I ever have to worry about when I'm on Tumblr.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 22:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 09:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 23:52 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)I mean that is not saying much, but I don't think anything is as bad as the SJW crowd on tumblr.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 10:59 pm (UTC)(link)I don't get why people act like it's some kind of hellhole, when it's actually very easy to just filter out what you don't want to see. Follow blogs of people whose insight you like and blogs that post stuff you like, and just block the people you don't wanna see. Blacklist keywords of stuff you don't wanna see.
Once you find your nice little corner tumblr is an amazing place. If you want to be connected and informed to every little thing in your fandom and if you like meta, then tumblr is a good fandom hub.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)It has gotten so I refuse to comment unanon on any subject (such as female characters/minorities in SPN) that even hints that it might deal with SJ issues, as I don't want to be dogpiled.
(no subject)
no subject
hmm
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:38 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:39 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:23 (UTC) - ExpandDA
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 07:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 18:47 (UTC) - ExpandRe: DA
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 19:34 (UTC) - ExpandSA
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 19:43 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-23 23:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:59 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 03:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:16 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:13 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:14 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:17 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:11 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:10 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 00:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 01:41 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 02:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 03:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-24 06:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)