Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2012-10-24 06:33 pm
[ SECRET POST #2122 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2122 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

__________________________________________________
16.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 034 secrets from Secret Submission Post #303.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 1 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 10:43 pm (UTC)(link)(in b4 someone whines about generalizations and we aren't all like that!!!11 cause that is the truly important thing here)
wow
also
Re: also
Re: wow
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:01 (UTC) - ExpandCOMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:07 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:44 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 20:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:02 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 20:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:27 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:29 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 00:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 20:35 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:19 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:30 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:36 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:21 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:43 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:52 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:42 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:45 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:10 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:31 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 04:00 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-26 20:39 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:54 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:58 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:06 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:12 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:28 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:51 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:57 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:38 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 23:16 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 03:32 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 04:15 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:41 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:49 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:55 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:08 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:23 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:01 (UTC) - ExpandRe: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
Re: COMPLETELY SERIOUS QUESTIONS
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:21 (UTC) - Expandno subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:19 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:06 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:51 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 06:28 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 10:56 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
I do sympathize though. I remember how, for some people, every single thing in Avatar the Last Airbender was viewed through the lens of shipping and ship-support and ship-sinking and it was like they thought every character besides Aang/Katara/Zuko/Mai and the entire plot and all the storylines and events and were just there as pointless filler or as plot devices that existed for the sole purpose of enhancing the (very minor, btw) romance angle and the shipping wars. Argh. Same for those ultra-fanatical Barney/Robin shippers too, who make me embarrassed to ship Barney/Robin because they're literally convinced that HIMYM is actually the story of how Barney and Robin met and the other three characters exist solely to give Barney and Robin someone to talk to when they're busy ~yearning.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
Fanon: Derek and Stiles are secretly in love. Like some forbidden Romeo and Juliet type deal. Derek watches out for poor, helpless little red riding hood Stiles. (He is often pictured with a red hoodie.)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 04:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:48 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)And then the creator of the show smashed down the fourth wall with the power of twitter when he cheerfully declared that he could be persuaded to make it canon, and it's been a bucket of insanity since then.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:49 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:55 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 22:50 (UTC) - Expandno subject
When I first watched Teen Wolf, I shipped Sterek. I think it's because I usually fall for the dynamic of ~broody frown monster~ and ~peppy snark monster~.
After thinking about it, they have nothing in common. Oh, wait, they both know the main character. And...that's it. They don't like each other. Stiles constantly alludes to how he wishes Derek would die, but fangirls play that off as "oh he's just being tough! he' really does care about him!" Which, no. He doesn't. Stiles cares about three things in the world: Scott (the main character), Lydia (the girl he's "in love with"), and his father. Everyone else can fuck off a cliff and die for all he cares. Stiles is an asshole.
Derek doesn't care about Stiles, either. All Derek cares about is avenging his dead sister and being a good leader. A job which he could use some improvement in.
Fandom, however, thinks they are in ~twu wuv~, which irks a lot of people because Stiles and Derek are literally the whitest dudes on the fucking show, and they aren't even confirmed gay. There's been some allusions as to whether Stiles may be bi or pan or something, and yes, I know that sexual orientation has never stopped fandom before but it's kinda gross.
Because the canon gay character just so happens to be named Danny Mahealani, as in, he's not white. And so he is glossed over by the entire fandom, or killed in fics for an emotional punch. Then they cry "but he's so boring/underdeveloped!" well, that's the writers' fault, and can't you develop him a bit more in your fics? You have no problem elaborating on Derek, Isaac, and Erica, all of whom are mysterious without a lot of backstory, but when it comes to Danny or Boyd (a black character)? NOPE. THEY'RE BORING I DON'T WANNA.
And the creator, Jeff Davis, says that he doesn't expand on Danny or Boyd because he "doesn't know enough about such minority groups so he's not comfortable writing them." Okay, then why are they even in the show? Better yet, HIRE WRITERS WHO ARE POC. And some more women, because you suck at writing women, Jeff Davis.
Worse is that Teen Wolf has fallen into queer-baiting; Jeff Davis and the other creators know that people ship Sterek, so they just love to tease everyone with it, even go so far as to have a fanfic contest, where like 1 out of 10 winning stories wasn't about Sterek.
I just feel there's a lot of hypocrisy in the fandom, and the slash goggles are on so tight that many Sterek fen are blinded to the fandom's problems.
And god forbid you're not a Sterek fan! If you don't ship it, then you may as well not even be alive, because you are a heartless piece of shit.
And don't get me started on the Sterek fen creating false meta to make it seem canon. Ugh. Meta is supposed to make you think about the world of the story, not reinforce your stupid ship.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:20 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:23 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 02:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 04:21 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:26 pm (UTC)(link)Especially the meta - which turns into just grasping at straws and weird inanimate object porn. I mean - I agree with another commenter above - they have a great antagonistic, reluctant allies relationship and for some reason shit like that drives the fangirls mad. Ijust don't understand why it can't stay a fandom thing and why everyone is chomping at the bit to make it canon - and using really bad reasoning for it to become so.
It doesn't help that Stiles is the fan favorite and Derek is so fucking hot - add in the possibility of hate sex and fangirls are excited.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-24 11:33 pm (UTC)(link)LET PEOPLE FAN THE WAY THEY WANT TO FAN.
Trying to get people to stop liking the things they like is an exercise in futility. Might I suggest instead:
- Accepting that you can't change some things.
- Ignoring things that bother you.
- Focusing on things you enjoy.
- NICELY (tip - blanket accusations of being racism, sexism, homophobia, ableism, whatever: not going to get people to listen to you) promoting parts of Teen Wolf (or whatever) that you think should be emphasized more.
- Be the change you want to see in your fandom or stop stressing about it.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:35 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:50 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:52 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:58 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 07:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:05 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:26 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 02:29 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-24 23:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:15 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:19 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:37 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:47 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 02:00 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:45 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:54 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:56 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:07 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:34 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 02:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 13:19 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:31 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 03:02 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 04:36 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 09:12 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 11:40 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 19:03 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 12:47 am (UTC)(link)how does shipping a certain pairing make you racist or ableist???
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 00:48 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2012-10-25 01:07 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 12:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I wouldn't ask for less Sterek (I totally enjoy it myself), I just want more of everyone and everything else.
Seriously, there's an amazing cast, a variety of interesting characters and there's a lot of different plots going on. I love to see more fandom focus on that stuff.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 05:09 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Basically, I understand why you'd be frustrated.
(no subject)
(no subject)
OP
(Anonymous) 2012-10-25 07:27 pm (UTC)(link)That, along with a lot of the general cluelessness about issues like race, gender, and sexual orientation, and the tendency of people on both sides of the issue to misappropriate causes and terminology to prop up their character and ship arguments, has made the fandom a pretty frustrating place to be at the best of times. I love the show and the characters, but lately I just tend to ignore the fandom at large and only bother talking about it with the friends I already have who like it. I'm currently hoping it just need to hit critical mass before the Sterek fervor can die down a bit and everyone on all sides will calm the hell down so I can enjoy my show about shirtless teenage werewolves without the residual fandom-induced headache.
Re: OP